| |
|
In this book, prominent participants
in the debate tell us their views:
Theodore Dalrymple
GP and author
Ann Furedi Director of Communications, British Pregnancy
Advisory Service
Mary Kenny journalist and writer
Emily Jackson Lecturer in Law, LSE
Helen Watt Director, Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics
Editor: Dr Ellie Lee Series Editor, Debating Matters
'Abortion occupies a rather curious
legal position. It is an exceptionally straightforward and frequently
performed operation (in England and Wales...about one in three
women will have an abortion at some point during their lives),
and yet it remains a criminal offence...A woman has no right to
terminate an unwanted pregnancy, and must instead depend entirely
upon the beneficent exercise of medical discretion...[W]e should
consider whether the laws extraordinary treatment of abortion
sits uneasily with the rest of British medical law. In particular,
the Acts insistence upon two doctors deciding whether a
woman should be able to terminate an unwanted pregnancy may be
out of step with the increasing priority given to a patients
right to make their own decisions about their medical treatment.
Emily Jackson
Senior Lecturer in Law, London School of Economics
'With the coming of legal abortion,
thousands of children have lost their lives at the hands of...
doctors...Every abortion is a human tragedy for the child and
for its mother: a tragedy which could - and should - have been
avoided. No child can be replaced by a child born
later. Every child is an individual, with its own future to respect.
In the area of abortion, the hard questions must be faced, without
seeking refuge in slogans or in knee-jerk reactions. Abortion
is a major social injustice, directed at those who are most vulnerable...We
should learn to live in peace with our children, for the nine
months when they first need us - remembering that we ourselves
enjoyed the peace and safety of the womb at the start of our lives.'
Helen Watt
Director, Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics
'People these days are reluctant
to submit themselves to external sources of moral authority, which
they consider inherently illegitimate...What right, asks modern
man, has anyone to tell me how I should organise my life? In other
words, in the reigning cultural climate, it will be very difficult
to achieve with regard to abortion a respect for the general sanctity
of human life while at the same time recognizing that abortion
is some circumstances humane. The crudity of modern moral discourse,
in which ignorant armies clash by night, prevents the prevents
the necessary subtle distinctions from being made.
Theodore Dalrymple
GP and writer
'Every year the publication of
the annual abortion statistics provokes a discussion about why
Britains abortion rate remains high relative to other European
countries...Those who oppose legal abortion insist that the abortion
rate is a symptom of a culture of convenience and
a degraded out-of-control society. In truth, it may
be that the British abortion rate is evidence that women have
a strong desire to keep control of their lives...It may be that,
for many women in modern Britain, abortion is seen as the solution
to a problem rather than a problem in itself. Perhaps it is time
to conclude that abortion has become as much a part of contemporary
life as e-mail, espresso and Lycra.
Ann Furedi
former Director of Communications, British Pregnancy Advisory
Service
'So whose right on abortion? It
was always a matter of conflicting rights - the right to choose
against the right to life... Opinion polls tend to show that people
accept that abortion should be legal, but it does not follow that
they always consider it moral. It is now more widely conceded
that it is a womans right to choose what she does with her
body; at the same time, it is more deeply recognized that the
body within her body is a small human one, and that, as it grows,
it acquires more rights... Perspectives on abortion have changed
over the past 35 years, and will change again in the coming times...
When the right to choose is extended to the further
choice of destroying the unborn, or, alternatively, donating it
to grow in a synthetic womb, then we will surely be in a whole
new moral dilemma once more.
Mary Kenny
journalist and writer
Buy
this book at Amazon.co.uk >>
|